Re: Fuzzy Quantum Mechanics?

Stephen Paul King (
Mon, 15 Jul 1996 18:12:26 +0200

In <4s3t3l$> (Robert Shafer)
>This is a question that came up for me a while back that I have
>pretty much no idea how to answer. I just joined this newsgroup
>a day or two ago and the probability vs. fuzzy discussion reminded
>me of the question.
>That is, has anyone considered restating quantum physics using fuzzy
>semantics? I don't have a clue what such a restatement would "sound"
>like, or if it even makes sense to try. Anyone else have any idea?

B. Kosko, in his usual manner, alludes to the idea of restating Q.M. in
his book Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems. I am VERY interested in
this idea but have not been able to find any follow up on it. It could
be that any attempt to publish a paper on Fuzzy Q.M. would generate a
flame attack of Armagedonic proportions by the traditional physicists.

Is there anyone brave enough to attempt this challenge?!

Stephen Paul King