Subject: Re: Justification for FLC
Date: Fri Jan 14 2000 - 07:53:22 MET
I must point out that lot of technologies are in use cause they are
there. We have become more technology driven than requirement \need
driven. There is no doubt that fuzzy is easy to understand and
implement than any model based control. However, any new technology may
be fully understood to gain most out of it and that is exactly what I
am trying to do.
I would also like to point out that I am researching in intelligent
controllers its unfortunate that my postings infer that I feel they are
>From now on I will only discuss possibilities etc. and bury the
justification issue as it seems so senstive.
by the way if anybody has any application notes on FLC impletation I
will greatly appriciate if its send to me electronically.
email@example.com (Edgar Dohmann) wrote:
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
> > I would like to explain what I said in my previous post about
> > justification of FLC.
> > Why should someone go for FLC if for example a mathematical model
> > exists and controller can be designed using BODE in frequency
> And my point is that there could be many reasonable justifications for
> such a decision. For example, if you have an excellent GUI tool like
> TILShell available for doing your FLC design, development, and
> may be much faster and easier to implement the solution with FLC than
> some other, possibly equally suitable, solution.
> > From what I understand from so maney replies is that FLC may not be
> > used in an application where instability could lead to loss of life
> > limb but because of its marketability FLC may be applied in all
> > application not because their stability is proven but because they
> > sound cute.
> I doubt if many serious application engineers utilize any
> because it sounds cute". I know of many practical industrial and
> commercial applications that have been implemented by a number of
> different engineers in various companies utilizing FLC. None of these
> chose FLC for their solution because it sounded "cute".
> It sounds to me like you have made up your mind that FLC is worthless
> are just attacking anyone who wants to use it as making a silly
> If that's the case, then you really don't have anything worthwhile to
> contribute to this list.
> > 90% potential improvement is claimed by some for FLC(I hope you
> > guessed what it means)Well my quastion is how difficult is it to
> > that? I am sure that its a tedious hit and trial.
> Not necessarily if you have good development tools like TILShell.
> > All I have been saying is that linear-->non-linear-->adaptive and
> > FLC may be considered.
> Well, a good engineer should always consider various possible
> for a problem and select the one that best suits the situation at
> There are almost always many factors that lead one to the particular
> solution for any given problem and constraints. So, while I would
> that all 4 approaches you list are valid considerations for a given
> control logic design, it is rather shortsighted and narrow-minded to
> that they must be considered in the order that you listed them with
> implication that FLC is only suitable if the other 3 solutions will
> > I hope you have heard about a plane crash in 70s which sealed the
> > of Adaptive Control. FLCs somehow might meet the same fate.
> > In academics there is lot of debate going on about justification of
> > and all I am trying to do is to get involved.
> My point exactly. A purely academic argument that does not consider
> realities of a practical commercial project and design implementation
> doesn't carry much weight in my opinion.
> Edgar Dohmann
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
This message was posted through the fuzzy mailing list.
(1) To subscribe to this mailing list, send a message body of
"SUB FUZZY-MAIL myFirstName mySurname" to firstname.lastname@example.org
(2) To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message body of
"UNSUB FUZZY-MAIL" or "UNSUB FUZZY-MAIL email@example.com"
(3) To reach the human who maintains the list, send mail to
(4) WWW access and other information on Fuzzy Sets and Logic see
(5) WWW archive: http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/marchives/fuzzy-mail/index.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Apr 06 2000 - 15:59:38 MET DST