Re: Question about "Fuzzy expert system".

Will Dwinnell (76743.1740@compuserve.com)
Tue, 6 Oct 1998 03:22:13 +0200 (MET DST)

I (Will Dwinnell) wrote:
"Actually, the way I was thinking about this, each conclusion
would not be "1/2 true", but both would be completely true, but
pursued as seperate lines of inference. This is where the messy
part comes in: with even a modest number of splits like this, the
number of lines of inference being pursued in parallel will
increase rapidly."

Eric Gaudet responded:
"You're right : my mistake. But what's fuzzy then ?"

In and of itself, IF A THEN B OR C does not have to be fuzzy at
all. Of course, it could be fuzzified any number of ways, as
with ordinary, single-consequent rules.

-- 
Will Dwinnell

############################################################################ This message was posted through the fuzzy mailing list. (1) To subscribe to this mailing list, send a message body of "SUB FUZZY-MAIL myFirstName mySurname" to listproc@dbai.tuwien.ac.at (2) To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message body of "UNSUB FUZZY-MAIL" or "UNSUB FUZZY-MAIL yoursubscription@email.address.com" to listproc@dbai.tuwien.ac.at (3) To reach the human who maintains the list, send mail to fuzzy-owner@dbai.tuwien.ac.at (4) WWW access and other information on Fuzzy Sets and Logic see http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/ftp/mlowner/fuzzy-mail.info (5) WWW archive: http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/marchives/fuzzy-mail/index.html