fuzzy implication

Paul Bergondy (danb@magicnet.net)
Sun, 21 Jun 1998 15:26:04 +0200 (MET DST)

I have only recently begun reading Kosko's "Fuzzy Engineering";
my first real foray into this subject. I'm curious why the
seemingly natural definition of fuzzy implication is not used.

That is,

t(p ---> q) := max{1-t(p), t(q)}

############################################################################
This message was posted through the fuzzy mailing list.
(1) To subscribe to this mailing list, send a message body of
"SUB FUZZY-MAIL myFirstName mySurname" to listproc@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
(2) To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message body of
"UNSUB FUZZY-MAIL" or "UNSUB FUZZY-MAIL yoursubscription@email.address.com"
to listproc@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
(3) To reach the human who maintains the list, send mail to
fuzzy-owner@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
(4) WWW access and other information on Fuzzy Sets and Logic see
http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/ftp/mlowner/fuzzy-mail.info
(5) WWW archive: http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/marchives/fuzzy-mail/index.html